Legal Opinion
Peterson v. City of Wichita, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 14, 1989No. 86-1013-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. In his suit, plaintiff alleges because of his race he was discharged from his position with defendant as Director of the Human Resources Department. Plaintiff seeks relief only under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. Besides denying it committed any unlawful discrimination, the defendant City of Wichita (City) contends plaintiff is precluded, as a matter of law, from any relief under Title VII for his failure to file a timely charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harold PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Lange v. Cigna Individual Financial Services Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Silva v. Universidad De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1993
- Wagher v. Guy's Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Dubose v. District 1199C, National Union of Hospital & Health Care EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.