Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. Carolina Farm Supply of Johnston, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 1983No. 0010PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

The plaintiffs in these consolidated cases sued for damages for the death of their swine. They alleged that the loss was caused by toxic corn negligently furnished by the defendant Carolina Farm Supply to the plaintiff C. O. Clark, Jr., doing business as Hillcrest Farm. Hillcrest milled the corn into feed and sold it to two other farms operated by the remaining plaintiffs. The jury returned a verdict for Carolina Supply in all three cases. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Hillcrest is a farming operation engaged, among other things, in raising feeder hogs and in milling hog feed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Southern Railway, Carolina Div.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Whisenant v. James Island CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Wilson v. Charleston & Savannah Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  4. Cook v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Rayfield Ex Rel. Estate of Rayfield v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Griffin v. Van NormanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Stonehenge Engineering Corp. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Carrigg v. BlueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Jackson Ex Rel. Estate of Jackson v. Price Ex Rel. Estate of PriceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API