Legal Opinion

Draim v. Virtual Geosatellite Holdings, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 2, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2001-2690Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHN E. DRAIM, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 01-2690 (JMF) VIRTUAL GEOSATELLITE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. FINDINGS OF FACT, SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND MEMORANDUM OPINION FINDINGS OF FACT 1992-1997 1. On November 1, 1992, Draim was hired as a consultant by Mobile Communications Holdings, Incorporated (“MCHI”) pursuant to a written consulting agreement dated November 1, 1992. Trial Transcript (“Tr.”) at 14. 2. Draim worked for MCHI as a consultant through June 30, 1997. Tr. at 16. He was paid by the hour. Tr. at 15. 3.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Paul v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Willoughby v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Kerrigan v. Britches of Georgetowne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Sullivan v. Heritage FoundationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API