Legal Opinion

In re Benicar (Olmesartan) Products Liability Litigation

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 13, 2017No. Master Docket No. 15-2606 (RBK/JS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*140MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge

The discovery issue before the Court is whether two of plaintiffs’ medical experts must produce redacted copies of patient medical records they considered in forming their expert opinions.1 The Court received the parties’ written submissions and held oral argument on March 8, 2017. For the reasons to be discussed, plaintiffs will be Ordered to produce the requested records.

Background

In brief summary, this is an approximate 1800 case Multidistriet Litigation involving defendants’ olmesartan prescription drugs. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County v. Lfg, LLC Navistar International Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Synthes Spine Co., L.P. v. WaldenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Younes v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Dyson Technology Ltd. v. Maytag Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cellco Partnership, et al. v. The County of Monmouth, New Jersey, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  2. Johnson v. City of RockfordDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Kathleen Moller v. Martian Sales, Inc., et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
  4. LINCOLN HARBOR ENTERPRISES, LLC v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  5. Tri Harbor Holdings Corporation v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API