Legal Opinion
St. Denis v. De Toledo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 9, 2005No. AC 25479PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Thomas St. Denis, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the motion filed by the defendants, attorney Victoria de Toledo and the law firm of Casper & de Toledo, LLC, to strike his second revised complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motion to strike the first and third counts of his second revised complaint. We conclude that the plaintiff waived his right to appeal from the granting of the motion to strike the second revised complaint and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- P & L Properties, Inc. v. Schnip Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- DeConti v. McGloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Parker v. GINSBURG DEVELOPMENT CT, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3Cited by13 opinions
- Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Bross v. Hillside Acres, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- McCoy v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.