Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the Board), assessed the defendant as a presumptive level three sexually violent offender based upon a total risk factor score on the risk assessment instrument of 140 points. At a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, the Supreme Court deducted 20 points from the defendant’s risk assessment score, leaving the defendant with a risk assessment score of 120 points and a presumptive level three offender status. The defendant requested a downward departure from his presumptive risk level status. The defendant’s application was denied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. BowdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. ColavitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. PeeplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. ShephardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. GantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API