Legal Opinion

People v. Peeples

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 1, 2012PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), entered November 28, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A court has the discretion to downwardly depart from the presumptive risk level in a proceeding under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) (see Correction Law art 6-C) only after the defendant makes a twofold showing. First, the defendant must identify “as a matter of law, an appropriate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. People v. PendletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. RoldanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API