Legal Opinion
Suro v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2000No. 1:95-cv-04778PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Yolanda Suro and her infant son David, bring this action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80, to recover for injuries that David allegedly sustained as a result of ingesting lead paint. Plaintiffs claim that David’s lead paint exposure occurred while he was living in a Brooklyn apartment building that was owned by the defendant United States of America as a result of a civil forfeiture. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mas v. Two Bridges AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CPT Medical Services, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Bloomfield Investment Resources Corp v. DaniloffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Cadet v. Alliance Nursing Staffing of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023