Legal Opinion

Butz v. Hahn Paint & Varnish Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 12, 1935No. 43141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

J. Elwood Butz commenced this proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1931, Section 1361 et seq., as amended), against the Hahn Paint & Varnish Company, C. A. Hahn, sole owner, C. A. Hahn, and Builders & Manufacturers Mutual Casualty Company of Chicago, to recover for an alleged partial loss of vision. The defendants denied that appellee was a workman or employee within the meaning of the statute and further denied the alleged injury and disability. The deputy industrial commissioner, sitting as sole arbiter, made the finding that on June 12, 1933, J. Elwood Butz, the claimant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haswell v. StandringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Malvern National Bank v. HallidaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Shepard v. Carnation Milk Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Johnson Bros. v. Carter & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Serrano v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Johnson & SonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  2. York v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Anderson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API