Legal Opinion
In Re Wyoming Tight Sands Antitrust Cases
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 7, 1988No. Civ. A. 85-2349-SPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
These consolidated actions concern allegations that certain suppliers of natural gas conspired to fix inflated prices in violation of the federal antitrust laws. Several distinct categories of plaintiffs are suing several distinct categories of defendants. The issue presently before the court is ultimately one of standing: Who are the proper parties to assert the antitrust claims?
I
The facts can be simplified for purposed of the present dispute. Three companies (defendants Amoco Production Company; CSG Exploration Company, and Cities Service Oil and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kansas v. UtiliCorp United Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re Wyoming Tight Sands Antitrust CasesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Wyoming Tight Sands Antitrust CasesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Hospital Authority of Metropolitan Government v. Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Kansas v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.