Legal Opinion
Kansas v. Amoco Production Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1989No. Nos. 88-2158, 88-2159PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves a single issue: May residential consumers who are indirect purchasers of natural gas maintain an antitrust suit against the alleged antitrust violators?
I
Three investor-owned public utilities, the Kansas Power & Light Company, Kansas Gas & Electric Company, and UtiliCorp United Inc., filed separate complaints against defendants Amoco Production Co., Cities Service Oil and Gas Corporation, CSG Exploration Company, The Moxa Limited Partnership, and The Wamsutter Limited Partnership, alleging, inter alia, that all defendants illegally conspired to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Olin Jones v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation, and University Ford, Inc., and Maury KempCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Wyoming Tight Sands Antitrust CasesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989