Legal Opinion

Nedzvekas v. Fung

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 26, 2007No. 1-06-0479PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman

The plaintiff, Teresa Nedzvekas, appeals from an order of the circuit court barring her from calling certain witnesses at trial and the court’s subsequent order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Dr. Barnett Fung, in this refiled medical negligence action. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the barring order, reverse the summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, and remand this cause to the circuit court for further proceedings.

The facts relevant to the resolution of this appeal are undisputed.

On October 6, 2003, the plaintiff filed this action against the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Sullivan v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Village of Lake Villa v. StokovichIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Benson v. StaffordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Cetera v. DiFilippoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Klingelhoets v. Charlton-PerrinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. Boyd v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Janda v. United States Cellular Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API