Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. McGinnes

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1958No. Civ. A. 24217PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The defendant Manu-Mine had contracts with the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and others which resulted in large profits. The complaint avers that, in 1956, Manu-Mine paid to the office of McGinnes, the District Director of Internal Revenue, income taxes for the taxable year ending October 31, 1955, in the sum of more than $1,000,000. The money so paid was entirely derived from funds obtained from the Turnpike Commission by means of a conspiracy to defraud. In 1957 Manu-Mine assigned to the defendant Seaboard, a creditor, all of its interest in any money which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. Evans v. International Typographical UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1948
  4. Gerth v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
  5. Paxson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. McGinnesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Seven-Up Company v. O-So Grape Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1959
  3. United States v. StonehillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1976
  4. 641 Associates, Ltd. v. Balcor Real Estate Finance, Inc. (In Re 641 Associates, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Roodveldt v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API