Legal Opinion

Le Barron v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1966PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The appeal raises these two issues:(1) Was the evidence adduced sufficient to prove the finding of defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime of attempted rape?(2) Was trial counsel’s handling of the defense of not guilty by reason of insanity and feeblemindedness such as to deny defendant a fair trial?

Sufficiency of Evidence.

In order to resolve the first issue it is necessary to set forth a résumé of the material facts adduced in evidence.

On March 3, 1965, at 6:55 p. m., the complaining witness, Jodean Eanden, a housewife, was walking home across a fairly well-traveled railroad…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. DammsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. CatheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Oakley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bethards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Jacobs v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lhost v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API