Le Barron v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The appeal raises these two issues:(1) Was the evidence adduced sufficient to prove the finding of defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime of attempted rape?(2) Was trial counsel’s handling of the defense of not guilty by reason of insanity and feeblemindedness such as to deny defendant a fair trial?
Sufficiency of Evidence.
In order to resolve the first issue it is necessary to set forth a résumé of the material facts adduced in evidence.
On March 3, 1965, at 6:55 p. m., the complaining witness, Jodean Eanden, a housewife, was walking home across a fairly well-traveled railroad…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. DammsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. CatheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Oakley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by19 opinions
- Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Bethards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Jacobs v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Lhost v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.