Lhost v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.
There are two issues presented on appeal:
1. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty to the crime of attempted rape ?
2, Did the trial court err in refusing to admit the results of polygraph test favorable to the defendant because the prosecution refused to stipulate?
The defense has alleged that the evidence is not sufficient to meet the statutory elements of attempted rape. Attempted rape is defined by sec. 944.01, Stats.1 1978 *627and sec. 989.82(2), Stats. 1973. The statutes read as follows:
“944.01 Rape. (1) Any male who has sexual intercourse with a female he knows is not his…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pickens v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Darrel McMorris v. Thomas Israel and Bronson C. LafolletteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- State v. DeFreitasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.