Legal Opinion
State v. Lea
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 19, 1997No. C8803-32590 and C9409-35604; CA A90541 (Control) and CA A90723PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant, in consolidated appeals, seeks reversal of convictions for rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.375; ORS 163.405, and also seeks reversal of a consequent revocation of probation on a separate matter. He argues, inter alia, that the trial court erred in striking his testimony in a suppression hearing after he invoked the right against self-incrimination during the state’s cross-examination. We conclude that the trial court did not err and affirm.
On August 24, 1994, Oregon State Police Detective Vicki Roberts and Portland Police Bureau Detective Mike…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lem Woon v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BartmessOregon Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BogguessSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. NajibiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. Martinez-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017