Papooshek v. Winona & St. Peter Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the railway company from an order of the district court for Winona county, Start, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $100 for the land-owner, on the trial of an appeal from the commissioners’ award in condemnation proceedings.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The defendant instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire the right to build a branch or spur track from its main line or tracks in the city of Winona, along Front street in that city, to secure access to mills and business houses requiring further railway facilities, and for the convenience of shippers doing business over its lines. The Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company had already secured a right of way along the same street; and the defendant had secured the permission of the city council to locate its tracks there, subject to certain conditions and regulations. This case and ten…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mercer v. . VoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Stevens v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Bedell v. . the Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Woodruff v. Imperial Fire Insurance Co. of London, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bristol County Savings Bank v. KeavyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Backus v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Meyers v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Crich v. Williamsburg City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Blondel v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.