Legal Opinion
Quick v. City of Fairview
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 9, 1930No. 19712PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Elmer Quick sued the city of Fairview for the sum of $1,000 and interest, alleging that on April 7, 1925, he was duly elected city marshal of Fairview; that he qualified as such marshal on May 4, 1925, and exercised the duties of said office until June 29, 1926, when he was unlawfully removed from his office and denied his salary for the balance of his term, though the same was properly claimed.
The city of Fairview answered, admitting all material allegations of plaintiff’s petition, but alleged an affirmative defense in this: That plaintiff, Quick,, was lawfully removed from the said office…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Christy v. the City of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. ChaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Jamieson v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Readdy v. MallorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ramsey v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. FrancisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- City of Ardmore v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Wentz v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- In Re the Discharge of WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.