Legal Opinion

Mid-Century Insurance v. Shutt

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1993No. 67,993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gernon, J.:

This is an appeal by Bailey Perkins from a ruling that Mid-Century Insurance Company had no obligation to pay additional sums under an automobile policy issued by Mid-Century to Walter and Sandra Shutt.

Bailey Perkins, who was three and a half years old at the time of her injuries, was walking on a shoulder of the road when she was struck by an automobile driven by Tracy Shutt. Bailey sustained serious physical injuries and incurred substantial medical expenses.

The Shutts had a personal automobile insurance policy with Mid-Century which provided liability coverage on the motor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McGee by and Through McGee v. ChalfantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. McCart v. MuirSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Grimmett v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. GRE INSURANCE GROUP v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Helmick v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hodgson Ex Rel. Hodgson v. Bremen Farmers' Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API