Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Salomon
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
The issues presented on this motion cry out for definitive analysis and for clarification and determination, there being conflict in position as between the decisions of various appel*612late departments. To the above conflicting positions one might additionally add those of Professor Joseph M. McLaughlin and Professor David Siegel.
The facts in the instant matter are classical, truly characteristic of the factual situations wherein the issues presented herein arise; it is, therefore, necessary to set forth, in brief, a synopsis of the agreed facts and dates…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 149 Clinton Avenue North, Inc. v. GrassiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Pruyn v. McCrearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Marony v. ApplegateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Kilarjian v. KilarjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Wildermuth v. PiousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Independence Savings Bank v. Triz Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bonaparte v. McCarthyNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Copeland v. SalomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981