Legal Opinion
Wildermuth v. Pious
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 9, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding by a judgment creditor under articles 51 and 52 of the CPLR, to enforce collection of a money judgment against judgment debtors (Robert L. Bradford, Bradford Audio Corporation and others), Edward Pious, as the receiver appointed in an action in the Supreme Court, New York County, under the Martin Act (General Business Law, art. 23-A, § 352 et seq.), appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 20,1964, which: (1) denied his motion, pursuant to CPLR 404, to dismiss the petition as insufficient in law; (2) granted summary judgment on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- New York Municipal Railway Corp. v. Susie Church HollidayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Matter of New York Municipal Railway Corp. v. . HollidayNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Town of Greenburgh v. ShalleckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Copeland v. SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- 149 Clinton Avenue North, Inc. v. GrassiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Seitz v. Freeman (In Re CitX Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Copeland v. SalomonNew York Supreme Court · 1980
- Trans World Maintenance Services v. Fort Tryon Apartment Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1995