Legal Opinion
United States v. Pablo Vincent Montoya
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1982No. 80-2329PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Pablo Montoya appeals convictions on offenses charged under a multiple count indictment generated by his assault of a Federal law enforcement officer. Montoya asserts the trial judge erroneously refused to instruct the jury on certain defense theories and improperly denied a motion for acquittal on two of the counts. We find these claims devoid of merit and affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
An ill-starred “drug bust” provides the factual framework for evaluating Montoya’s appeal. A synopsis of that incident can be culled from the trial record properly…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Scarborough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Joseph Alfred TannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joseph A. TravisanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Kelly Rollins and Dan SlaughterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William Joseph ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.