Legal Opinion

Tanford v. Brand

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided May 4, 1995No. IP 95-492 C B/SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKER, Chief Judge.

Today we must answer a question explicitly left open by the Supreme Court in Lee v. Weisman, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992) — namely, whether a member of the clergy may offer prayers as part of a public university’s graduation ceremony consistent with the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. Because Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of their succeeding on the merits, we deny their motion for preliminary injunc-tive relief.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Given the accelerated pace of this suit, the underlying facts are still somewhat…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ram Products Co., Inc. v. ChaunceyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  2. Wil-Kar, Inc. v. Village of GermantownDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  4. NEW ALBANY DVD, LLC v. City of New Albany, IndianaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
  5. Marshall v. Town of MerrillvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API