Tanford v. Brand
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
BARKER, Chief Judge.
Today we must answer a question explicitly left open by the Supreme Court in Lee v. Weisman, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992) — namely, whether a member of the clergy may offer prayers as part of a public university’s graduation ceremony consistent with the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution. Because Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a likelihood of their succeeding on the merits, we deny their motion for preliminary injunc-tive relief.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Given the accelerated pace of this suit, the underlying facts are still somewhat…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ram Products Co., Inc. v. ChaunceyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Wil-Kar, Inc. v. Village of GermantownDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- NEW ALBANY DVD, LLC v. City of New Albany, IndianaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2005
- Marshall v. Town of MerrillvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017