Legal Opinion

Baselski v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 20, 1981No. 80C3157PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

The motion at bar involves purported violations of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77 et seq., and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78 et seq. In addition, the plaintiffs allege various breaches of the defendants’ common law duties. Subject matter jurisdiction of the federal claims is founded upon Section 22(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77v(a), and Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa. Jurisdiction of the state claims is founded upon the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction.

The plaintiffs, Thomas and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,615 Wayne E. Pierson and Ruth E. Pierson v. Dean, Witter, Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. James E. Morgan v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re Olympia Brewing Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API