Legal Opinion

Quinlan v. Jones

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 1, 2004No. 2030621PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

922 So.2d 899 (2004)

Kenneth P. QUINLAN

v.

Eric JONES.

No. 2030621.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

October 1, 2004.

Kenneth P. Quinlan, pro se.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Andrew Hamilton Smith, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

2Per curiam

In September 2003, Kenneth P. Quinlan, proceeding pro se, sued Eric Jones, alleging that Jones had committed an assault and battery on him on November 25, 2002, and on December 30, 2002, and that Jones had committed an assault on him on December 2, 2002.[1] Quinlan also alleged that Jones had wrongfully deprived him of his personal property on November 25, 2002, and on…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pittman; Concurrence · Yates; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Crawley; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Murdock.

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fleming v. DowdellDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte QuinlanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Quinlan v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Quinlan v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API