Legal Opinion

Kuznar v. Raksha Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2006No. Docket 259501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s order denying their motion for summary disposition of plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (period of limitations). We affirm.

I. FACTS

This case arises out of plaintiffs 1 refilling of a prescription at defendant Raksha Corporation, doing business as Crown Pharmacy, on November 11, 2000. Plaintiff presented a prescription for 0.125-milligram tablets of Mirapex. According to plaintiff, defendant Valerie Randall, who is not a pharmacist, and who was not acting under the supervision of a pharmacist, refilled the prescription with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Fane v. Detroit Library CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Simmons v. Apex Drug Stores, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. MacDonald v. BarbarottoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kuznar v. Raksha Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Trowell v. Providence Hospital and Medical Centers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Santwan Reese v. Jalen Christopher JamesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Tameka McCree v. Continental Management LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API