Legal Opinion
Perez v. Falls Financial, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 2000No. 98-1775PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
We find that the facts of this case fail to reach the very high standard necessary to invoke the civil plain error doctrine set forth by this court in Goldfuss v. Davidson (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 116, 679 N.E.2d 1099, syllabus.
In Goldfuss, this court set forth the standard for the plain error doctrine as follows:
“In appeals of civil cases, the plain error doctrine is not favored and may be applied only in the extremely rare case involving exceptional circumstances where error, to which no objection was made at the trial court, seriously affects the basic fairness, integrity, or public…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital WestOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Shaffer v. MaierOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brock v. ServproOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Irvine v. Akron Beacon JournalOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kitson v. Gordon Food Serv.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Lynch v. GreenwaldOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Southside River-Rail Terminal, Inc. v. Crum & Forster UnderwritersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.