Legal Opinion

Quinby v. Union Pacific Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1909No. 15,598PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dawson county: Bruno,O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

Action for damages because of the alleged negligence of defendant. Plaintiffs prevailed, and defendant appeals. The verdict responded separately to two causes of action, and it was not argued at the bar that the verdict was wrong as to the second cause of action, and the judgment to that extent will be affirmed.

Concerning the first cause of action, plaintiffs in December, 1906, owned and desired’ to ship from Lexington, Nebraska, to Denver, Colorado, 20 valuable draft horses. In order that said horses might be transported with dispatch, plaintiffs waited for a fast freight. Defendant’s agent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evans v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Chamberlain Banking House v. WoolseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Nelson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. SchuldtNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ruebel Bros. v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. Allender v. Chicago & NorthWestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Philpott v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API