Legal Opinion

Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Schuldt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1902No. 11,356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Day, C.

On July 1, 1897, the plaintiffs shipped fifty-eight head of hogs over the defendant’s railway from Bancroft, Nebraska, to South Omaha, Nebraska. The hogs were loaded on the car about nine o’clock in the evening and when delivered to the consignee at the place of destination upon the following morning, twenty-two were .dead, and the rest were in a very had condition, on account of being overheated. The plaintiffs charge that the injury was the result of the failure of the defendant to pour water over and upon the hogs at different stations along the route, and in this particular it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grieve v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Oxley v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. SlatteryNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Starr v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Merchants' Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. MannNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Quinby v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API