Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 9, 2008No. 97C10933; A133123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

There is only one issue in this case, which is before us for the third time: Are the plaintiff state employees entitled to interest on the difference between (1) the amounts of original judgments for overtime compensation, which were entered in 2001 and 2002, and (2) the amounts of supplemental recalculated judgments entered following the remand in Young v. State of Oregon, 340 Or 401, 133 P3d 915 (2006) (Young III), with that interest running from the date of the original judgments? The trial court rejected plaintiffs’ asserted entitlement. As explained below, we conclude that the state has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seton v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pearson v. SchmittOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Newport Church of the Nazarene v. HensleyOregon Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API