Legal Opinion

King v. Starr

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1953No. 32475PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was brought by Ruby King, as guardian ad litem, on behalf of Carol King Gaddis and her husband, Robert Gaddis, both minors, against Ralph Starr and A. F. Beddoe as copartners, and their respective wives, to recover damages for personal injuries and expenses sustained by Carol King Gaddis while working for defendants. The trial resulted in a verdict for defendants. A motion for new trial was made and denied. This appeal was taken from the judgment of dismissal entered on the verdict.

This appeal is before us on a short record in accordance with Rule 34 (3) of Rules on Appeal, 34A…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Stratton v. C. H. Nichols Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Iverson v. McDonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Graham v. WristonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kadiak Fisheries Co. v. Murphy Diesel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Robbins v. GreeneWashington Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API