Legal Opinion

Doherty v. School Committee

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

These cross appeals raise issues of the interpretation of G. L. c. 39, § 23B (2)2 and 23B *644(3),3 the Commonwealth’s open meeting law. The plaintiffs, ten registered voters of the city of Boston who are also members of the Boston Teachers Union, appeal from a judgment in the Superior Court declaring that G. L. c. 39, § 23B (2), is not applicable if a school committee considers teachers’ layoffs based on budgetary constraints. The school committee appeals from a ruling that it was required to reconvene in open session to ratify the action taken at a properly held executive session. The judge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ghiglione v. School Committee of SouthbridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Boston Teachers Union, Local 66 v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. School Committee of Boston v. BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Puglisi v. School Committee of WhitmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Attorney General v. School Committee of TauntonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of College Park v. CotterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. DIST. ATT. FOR THE PLYMOUTH v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Baker v. Town of MiddleburyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Perryman v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Pearson v. Board of Health of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API