Legal Opinion

In re Auerbach

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application under subdivision 2 of section 28 of the liquor Tax Law (L. 1896, eh. 112) to revoke a license heretofore issued to Johannes M. Johannsen on the ground that the liquor tax certificate was issued upon an application in which the applicant made false answers.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

This is an application under subdivision 2 of section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law, to revoke a license heretofore issued to Johannes M. Johannsen on the ground, among others, that the liquor tax certificate was issued upon an application in which the applicant made false answers. In the view which I take of this case it is not necessary to consider all the answers which are alleged to be false. In answer to question 13 as to whether the applicant was entitled to traffic in liquors on the premises in question, the appplicant answered, “Tes.”" It appears from the affidavits read on the motion that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CullinanNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API