Legal Opinion
Perea v. De Harrison
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 24, 1904No. 45PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico.
1Per curiam
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Meagher v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company, 145 U. S. 608; Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. Osborne, 146 U. S. 354; Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Haseltine v. Central Bank of SpringfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Meagher v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Hubbard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Fotomat CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
- State v. BullSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.