Johnstone v. E & J Manufacturing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover $22,702, the alleged reasonable value of services alleged to have been rendered to defendants, defendant C. N. Erickson appeals.
*587The evidence being viewed most favorably to plaintiff (respondent) , the essential facts are:
Plaintiff, a physican and surgeon, in 1925 conceived the idea of manufacturing a resuscitator and gas anesthetic machine. He entered into a partnership with defendant Erickson to manufacture the same. This they did until 1926 when plaintiff and said defendant incorporated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Corato v. Estate of CoratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Osborn v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hocker v. GloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Builders Supply Corporation v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Yamanishi v. Bleily & Collishaw, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Konjoyan v. Der ZakarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Steiner v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.