Legal Opinion

Johnstone v. E & J Manufacturing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1941No. Civ. No. 13066PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover $22,702, the alleged reasonable value of services alleged to have been rendered to defendants, defendant C. N. Erickson appeals.

*587The evidence being viewed most favorably to plaintiff (respondent) , the essential facts are:

Plaintiff, a physican and surgeon, in 1925 conceived the idea of manufacturing a resuscitator and gas anesthetic machine. He entered into a partnership with defendant Erickson to manufacture the same. This they did until 1926 when plaintiff and said defendant incorporated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Corato v. Estate of CoratoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Osborn v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hocker v. GloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lazzarevich v. LazzarevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Builders Supply Corporation v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Yamanishi v. Bleily & Collishaw, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Konjoyan v. Der ZakarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Steiner v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API