Legal Opinion

Murray v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1897No. 9152PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Woodson District Court. Hon. L. Still-well, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

The plaintiff in error was injured in undertaking to cross a bridge. He attributes his injuries to defects in the bridge, negligently allowed to exist after notice to the chairman of the defendant Board, and sues to recover damages therefor under chapter 237 of the Laws of 1887. Gen. Stat. 1889, ¶" 7134. A verdict was returned and judgment rendered against him; from which judgment he prosecutes error to this court.

*31. Opinion evidence no competent, when. *2A witness who had experience in the building of bridges such as the one in question, after describing the method of its construction and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Harris v. Township of ClintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Best v. StonebackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Duncan v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Mason Ex Rel. Mason v. Hillsdale Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Montague v. Missouri & Kansas Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. Root v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API