Legal Opinion
People v. Shattuck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 28, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant upon his conviction for violation of probation without requiring an updated presentence investigation report. Defendant did not request that the initial report prepared some six months before be updated, and the court was fully familiar with changes in defendant’s status since the preparation of that report (see, People v Schalk, 198 AD2d 915, lv denied 82 NY2d 930; People v Wilkinson, 197 AD2d 872, lv denied 82 NY2d 854). Further, the failure to give defendant a written copy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of New York Environmental Control Board v. H.S.C. Management Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. DaveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. SchalkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. WilkinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ReavesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SomersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HemingwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.