Legal Opinion

People v. Davey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that his probation was improperly revoked because he was not given a written copy of the conditions of probation when his sentence was imposed (see, CPL 410.10). It is uncontroverted that defendant was aware of the condition that he violated, and any failure to give him a written copy at sentencing does not vitiate his conviction for violating probation (see, People v Bernstein, 163 AD2d 842, 843, Iv denied 76 NY2d 938; see also, People v…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. NazarianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ShattuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. BouwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. MainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. BetheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. BOUWENS, III, HERLAND, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API