Legal Opinion

People v. Skinner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Following the admission by defendant that he violated three conditions of his probation, County Court revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of l2h to 5 years’ imprisonment without first ordering an updated presentence investigation report. Although CPL 390.20 (1) requires a presentence investigation report when a sentence is imposed upon a felony conviction, where, as here, the court is fully familiar with any changes in defendant’s status, conduct or condition since the original report was prepared, an updated report is not required…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. KueyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. BrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. ReavesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. ShattuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. HemingwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SinclairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. DepoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API