Legal Opinion

Kings Laboratories, Inc. v. Yucaipa Valley Fruit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1936No. Civ. 1599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The plaintiff, a public warehouse company engaged in the business of storing fruit, is a public utility subject to the regulation and control of the Railroad Commission of the state of California, and a rate of seven cents a box for the storage of fresh fruit had been authorized by that commission. In August, 1929, the plaintiff stored a quantity of fresh peaches for the defendant and, at the solicitation of the defendant, agreed to reduce its charge from seven cents to five cents per box. The peaches were removed early the next month and sold. The plaintiff brought this action to collect the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Automobile Insurance Co. v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Hischemoeller v. National Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. Williamson v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API