State v. Oliphant
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Even assuming the trial court committed instructional error, upon review of the entire record, we cannot conclude that the alleged instructional error had a probable impact on the jury’s decision to convict both defendants and, therefore, find no plain error. Where there was sufficient evidence to support the submission of the charge of conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon to the jury as to each defendant, the trial court did not err in denying defendants’ individual motions to dismiss. And, where the trial court refused to allow the examination of the victim…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Bell v. StreevalDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021