Legal Opinion

Firemen's Insurance v. Motors Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

This is a suit by the plaintiff, Firemen’s Insurance Company, to require the defendant, Motors Insurance Corporation, to contribute pro rata to an automobile collision loss. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint and when plaintiff refused to plead further, dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s policy was issued to Courtesy Chevrolet Company and provided $100 deductible collision coverage for a 1964 Chevrolet automobile described in the policy. The automobile was damaged by collision while it was being driven by Eddie Lee Counts. The defend*603ant, Motors…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Oregon BankOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Crosetti Bros., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. EddyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Farmers Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API