Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1932No. K-488PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Special Findings of Fact. 1. Plaintiff filed his individual income tax return for 1917 April 1, 1918, and paid the tax shown thereon to be due.

Read the full summary

Special Findings of Fact. 1. Plaintiff filed his individual income tax return for 1917 April 1, 1918, and paid the tax shown thereon to be due. The partnership of McDonnell & Truda, of which he was a member during 1917, filed its return of income on form 1065 on April 1,1918, and paid the profits tax computed thereon under section 209 of the Revenue Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 307). March 18, 1923, the Commissioner made a jeopardy assessment of $100,005.14, excess profits tax for 1917, against the partnership, and a claim in abatement was filed protesting tho amount of the tax assessed. 2. November…

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The first contention of the plaintiff is that the written consent executed by him waiving the statute of limitation for assessment and collection of a deficiency against him for 1917 was executed after tho expiration of the statute of limitation; that it was obtained by duress, and was therefore invalid. Ho further insists that, since the period of limitation for making an additional assessment for 1917 expired prior to Juno 2, 3924, and the waiver in question was given after that date and before the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1928, the waiver in question is invalid…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States v. First National Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. Kellogg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. United States v. LehighDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
  4. Pacific Coast Steel Co. v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. RootCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API