Legal Opinion

Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. Mikles

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1950No. 4-9217PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Appellee, Mildes, recovered judgment against Kern-Limerick, Inc. for $6,000, being $2,000 damages for defective repair of a WK? tractor, and $4,000 damages for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding an HD 1 tractor. To reverse that judgment there is this appeal.

FACTS

Mildes — a resident of Booneville, Arkansas — purchased a secondhand WK tractor for $700 in July, .1947; and at his order Kern-Limerick, Inc. — a large road implement firm, maintaining repair departments, etc. in Little Bock, Arkansas — undertook to repair and recondition the tractor and add a “dozer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Pate v. J. S. McWilliams Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. CulbersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Schichtl v. S. F. Bowser CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. W. P. Galloway Co. v. PuryearSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oakland Raiders v. Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Hudspeth Motors v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  3. Union Motor Co. v. TurbivilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Advance Aluminum Castings Corp. v. DavenportSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Archer v. BucySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API