Legal Opinion
Hudspeth Motors v. Wilkinson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided September 28, 1964No. 5-3283PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(xeorge Hose Smith, J.
O. N. Wilkinson, the defendant below, bought a used truck from Hudspeth Motors, Inc., and executed a conditional sales contract calling for eighteen monthly payments. After having paid two installments during a period of some five months Wilkinson attempted to repudiate the contract, asserting a breach of warranty. The seller repossessed the truck, resold it, and brought suit under the Uniform Commercial Code for the balance still assertedly due. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 85-9-504 (Add. 1961). Wilkinson admitted his original obligation but relied upon the breach of warranty as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. MiklesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mallicoat v. Volunteer Finance & Loan Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
- Old Colony Trust Company v. Penrose Industries Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- City National Bank of Fort Smith v. Unique Structures, Inc., Susie Arnall, and Henry O. Arnall, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Airstream, Inc. v. CIT Financial Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Day v. Schenectady Discount Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.