Union Motor Co. v. Turbiville
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.
This is an action for damages, brought by the purchaser of an automobile against the seller, for misrepresentation of the car.
In September, 1952, appellee, Mrs. L. H. Turbiville, purchased and received from appellant, Union Motor Company, a 1952 Ford automobile; and the Buyer’s Order, signed by the parties, showed the following figures:
The cash price of the Ford and equipment was .........................................................$2,547.18
Mrs. Turbiville paid by delivering a DeSoto car .................................................................. 724.18
Leavi…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, Trustee v. NewtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Barham v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. MiklesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Pate v. J. S. McWilliams Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Logue v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Advocat, Inc. v. SauerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Moore Ford Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- O'Neal Ford, Inc. v. DavieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Greiner Motor Co. v. SumpterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.