Legal Opinion
Namey v. Malcolm
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 15, 2008No. 3:07-cv-02082PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RICHARD P. CONABOY, District Judge.
Here we consider Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). (Doc. 3.) With this Motion, Plaintiffs Joseph and Dorothy Namey (“Plaintiffs”) seek to have this case remanded to the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas on the basis that Defendants filed their Notice of Removal (Doc. 1) more than one year after the action was commenced with the filing of a Writ of Summons in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas on June 17, 2005. (Doc. 3.) Defendants filed their Notice of Removal (Doc. 1) on November 14, 2007, less than thirty (30)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- A.S. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Various v. VariousDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Spanier v. FreehSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Berbig v. Sears Roebuck and Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Parker Hannifin Corp. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.