Holyoke Mutual Insurance v. Carr
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
Brock, C.J.
The defendant, Robert H. Carr, II, individually and as executor of the estate of his son, Robert H. Carr, III, appeals the Superior Court’s (Gray, J.) finding that the deceased son was not a resident of the father’s household and therefore was not entitled to coverage under the uninsured motorist liability provision of the policy that the plaintiff, Holyoke Mutual Insurance Company in Salem (Holyoke), issued to the father. We hold that the evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion and therefore affirm.
Robert Carr, III, died in an automobile accident on July…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Daboul v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Connolly v. GalvinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Spaulding v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vaiarella v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Gulf Insurance v. AMSCO, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Susan R. White & a. v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Concord Group Insurance Companies v. SleeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Limoges v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.