Legal Opinion

People v. Willmirth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1966No. Crim. 292PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The state appeals from an order of the superior court setting aside an information, pursuant to section 995, subdivision 2, of the Penal Code, charging the defendant with possession, planting and cultivating marijuana. Based on the evidence received at the preliminary examination, the judge of the municipal court held that it appeared to him that the offense of violation of section 11530 of the Health and Safety Code had been committed, and that there was reasonable cause to believe that the defendant was guilty thereof. The defendant was there held to answer and the arraignment of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bompensiero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Frazzini v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. PoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API