Legal Opinion

People v. Poe

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1968No. Crim. 14077PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.

In an information, defendant was accused in two counts of perjury. Count 1 alleged in substance that defendant knowingly and falsely answered material questions while under oath at a hearing before a referee appointed by the Supreme Court on defendant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (His answers were in effect that he was subjected to brutality by police officers at the time of his arrest.) Count 2 alleged in substance that at said hearing defendant knowingly and falsely testified that police officers had threatened defendant.

Defendant made a motion, in the superior court, to set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. JablonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. People v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edmund Y. Chein v. Richard Shumsky, Chief Probation Officer, La County California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. People v. KobrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. VelasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. RubioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API